Step 5: Subtract Current FTEs from FTEs Needed to get Attorney Sufficiency

To assess the adequacy of current staffing levels to handle the projected caseload (Attorney Sufficiency), you must subtract FTE attorneys available to handle the caseload from FTEs Needed (Step 4).

To complete Step 5, you must:

Determine Current FTEs

To calculate Attorney Sufficiency, you first need to know the number of attorney FTEs currently ("Current FTEs"). This sounds simple; however, in practice, it can be complicated. First, you must exclude FTEs for attorneys who do not do casework (e.g., supervisors). Next, you must consider the types of cases that were excluded from the Projected Caseload (Step 2) and exclude all attorneys who represent clients in those cases (e.g., juvenile dependency attorneys). Finally, you should consider whether to subtract some portion of FTEs for attorneys just learning a new position (e.g., new attorneys or newly promoted attorneys).  
 

Attorneys with Supervisory or Administrative Responsibilities

Most providers have some attorneys who do not carry a caseload and other attorneys who have only partial caseloads. Often these are attorneys with supervisory, administrative, or training responsibilities. In determining the Current FTEs, you must subtract these FTEs. Consider a small public defender office with a total of eight attorneys including the chief public defender and a deputy chief public defender. Both the chief and deputy represent clients. They also supervise the rest of the attorneys. Both estimate that they spend half of their time on casework and the other half on supervision and administration. This office would exclude 0.5 FTE for the chief public defender and 0.5 FTE for the deputy from their count of Current FTEs.

In Fictional Jurisdiction, the chief public defender, four assistant chief public defenders, and the training director do not represent any clients. Therefore, Fictional Jurisdiction would exclude 6 FTE from its Current FTEs for its full-time chief, assistant chiefs, and training director

 

Additionally, in Fictional Jurisdiction, the adult criminal division is organized into 10 teams or trial divisions. Each trial division has a supervisor and an assistant supervisor:

  • Supervisors are estimated to spend 50% of their time on case work and 50% on supervision.
  • Assistant supervisors are estimated to spend 75% of their time on case work and 25% on supervision.

For each of their 10 trial divisions, Fictional Jurisdiction would exclude 0.5 FTE for the supervisor and 0.25 FTE for the assistant supervisor.

 

 

In total, Fictional Jurisdiction would exclude 13.5 FTE from their Current FTEs.

 

  

Attorneys Handling Matters Outside of the Projected Caseload 

Other attorneys may have responsibility for cases excluded from the Projected Caseload (Step 2). For example, most public defense providers also represent minors in juvenile delinquency proceedings. Some providers also serve people in civil commitment and dependency proceedings. You must exclude all attorney FTEs or partial FTEs who work on these excluded case types.  

If attorneys work on both adult criminal cases and excluded case types, you must discount each FTE by the percentage of time spent on the excluded case types. Consider an office in which one attorney covers the juvenile delinquency and civil commitment cases, as well as handling adult criminal cases. The attorney estimates that she spends 30% of her time on juvenile delinquency and civil commitment cases, which were not part of the Projected Caseload. This office would therefore exclude 0.3 FTE from their Current FTEs.

In Fictional Jurisdiction, the provider has several attorneys that exclusively handle cases that were excluded from their Projected Caseload

In total, 40 attorneys work in divisions that exclusively handle cases other than adult criminal representations. As a result, Fictional Jurisdiction must exclude 40 FTEs from their Current FTEs.

 

Attorneys Learning a New Position

Some public defense providers require new attorneys, or attorneys who are new to a division, to spend significant time shadowing other attorneys or serving as second chair. These providers may choose to proportionally reduce their Current FTEs for these attorneys because they do not have full-time availability for casework. Consider an office that requires new attorneys to spend their first three months shadowing experienced attorneys. This office would exclude 0.25 FTE each new attorney from the Current FTEs to account for this program.

Fictional Jurisdiction hired 30 new attorneys for the adult criminal division. In addition to a robust training and orientation program, these new attorneys shadow experienced misdemeanor lawyers for two weeks. Throughout their first year of employment, these new lawyers are also required to observe and second chair misdemeanor and felony proceedings. The office estimates that observation and shadowing takes about 10% of each new attorney’s time. Accordingly, Fictional Jurisdiction counts these 30 new attorneys as 90% available for casework (0.9 FTE) to allow for this additional training time

 

Complete Calculation of Current FTEs for Fictional Jurisdiction

Fictional Jurisdiction has a total of 410 full-time attorneys. Below is a complete example calculation of Current FTEs for Fictional Jurisdiction, compiling all of calculations completed above

 

After accounting for supervisory and administrative attorneys, attorneys handling other case types, and the partial discount for new attorneys, Fictional Jurisdiction has 353.5 FTEs to address their Projected Caseload.

 

Calculate Attorney Sufficiency

To determine whether your system is sufficiently staffed, you subtract Current FTEs from FTE Needed.

The goal is for Current FTEs to at least equal FTEs Needed. Some excess attorney staffing may be appropriate to accommodate caseload or staffing changes. The Projected Caseload (Step 2) is only an estimate. Further, during the year, some attorneys may take family or medical leave. Others may leave for new positions. A modest excess of attorney staffing can help providers address these staffing changes, avoiding case delays or backlogs and reducing the likelihood that providers will need to limit their case assignments.

    • If the difference is a positive number, you need more attorneys to handle the Projected Caseload (e.g., 200 FTEs Needed – 150 Current FTEs = 50 FTE Deficit).
    • If the difference is a significant negative number, your current attorney staffing exceeds what you need to handle the Projected Caseload (e.g., 150 FTEs Needed – 200 Current FTEs = 50 FTE Excess). 
    • If the difference is zero, or a relatively small negative number, your current attorney staffing aligns with what you need to address your Projected Caseload. 

Fictional Jurisdiction has 613.5 FTEs Needed (Step 4) and 353.5 Current FTEs (Step 5). The Fictional Jurisdiction therefore has a deficit of 260 attorneys

 

In other words, Fictional Jurisdiction has only 58% of the attorneys it needs to effectively represent its Projected Caseload (42% deficiency). 

 

Applying the NPDWS to calculate attorney staffing needed allows public defense providers to create4 budget and staffing requests based on their workload. The Deason Center provides support to public defense providers both working to apply the NPDWS and advocate for needed resources. To find out more about what the Deason Center can do for you, click the Get Help button below.